首页> 外文OA文献 >Photometric compliance of tablet screens and retro-illuminated acuity charts as visual acuity measurement devices
【2h】

Photometric compliance of tablet screens and retro-illuminated acuity charts as visual acuity measurement devices

机译:平板电脑屏幕的光度合规性以及作为视力测量设备的逆光视力表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mobile technology is increasingly used to measure visual acuity. Standards for chart-based acuity tests specify photometric requirements for luminance, optotype contrast and luminance uniformity. Manufacturers provide some photometric data but little is known about tablet performance for visual acuity testing. This study photometrically characterised seven tablet computers (iPad, Apple inc.) and three ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts with room lights on and off, and compared findings with visual acuity measurement standards. Tablet screen luminance and contrast were measured using nine points across a black and white checkerboard test screen at five arbitrary brightness levels. ETDRS optotypes and adjacent white background luminance and contrast were measured. All seven tablets (room lights off) exceeded the most stringent requirement for mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m2) providing the nominal brightness setting was above 50%. All exceeded contrast requirement (Weber ≥ 90%) regardless of brightness setting, and five were marginally below the required luminance uniformity threshold (Lmin/Lmax ≥ 80%). Re-assessing three tablets with room lights on made little difference to mean luminance or contrast, and improved luminance uniformity to exceed the threshold. The three EDTRS charts (room lights off) had adequate mean luminance (≥ 120 cd/m2) and Weber contrast (≥ 90%), but all three charts failed to meet the luminance uniformity standard (Lmin/Lmax ≥ 80%). Two charts were operating beyond manufacturer’s recommended lamp replacement schedule. With room lights on, chart mean luminance and Weber contrast increased, but two charts still had inadequate luminance uniformity. Tablet computers showed less inter-device variability, higher contrast, and better luminance uniformity than charts in both lights-on and lights-off environments, providing brightness setting was >50%. Overall, iPad tablets matched or marginally out-performed ETDRS charts in terms of photometric compliance with high contrast acuity standards.
机译:移动技术越来越多地用于测量视敏度。基于图表的敏锐度测试的标准规定了对亮度,验光对比度和亮度均匀性的光度要求。制造商提供了一些光度学数据,但对于用于视力测试的平板电脑性能知之甚少。这项研究用光度法对七台平板电脑(iPad,Apple Inc.)和三个ETDRS(早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变研究)的视力表进行了特征分析,并打开和关闭了室内照明灯,并将发现的结果与视力测量标准进行了比较。使用黑白棋盘测试屏幕上的九个点以五个任意亮度级别测量了平板电脑屏幕的亮度和对比度。测量了ETDRS视标和邻近的白色背景亮度和对比度。如果标称亮度设置高于50%,则所有七个平板电脑(关闭房间的照明灯)都超过了对平均亮度(≥120 cd / m2)的最严格要求。无论亮度设置如何,所有超过对比度的要求(Weber≥90%),并且五个都略低于要求的亮度均匀性阈值(Lmin / Lmax≥80%)。重新评估三个装有室内照明灯的平板电脑对平均亮度或对比度的影响很小,而亮度均匀性则超过了阈值。三个EDTRS图表(关闭房间的灯)具有足够的平均亮度(≥120 cd / m2)和Weber对比度(≥90%),但是所有三个图表均未达到亮度均匀性标准(Lmin / Lmax≥80%)。有两个图表超出了制造商建议的灯泡更换时间表。随着室内照明灯的打开,图表的平均亮度和Weber对比度增加,但是两个图表的亮度均匀性仍然不足。在亮度设置为> 50%的情况下,平板电脑在开灯和关灯环境下的设备间差异性都较小,对比度更高,亮度均匀性更好。总体而言,就高光敏度标准的光度合规性而言,iPad平板电脑与ETDRS图表相匹配或略胜一筹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号